Planning appeal decision
The Three Horseshoes, Spring Hill, Bubbenhall, CV8 3BD
Planning appeal 6003642 at The Three Horseshoes, Spring Hill, Bubbenhall, CV8 3BD (Warwick) was allowed on 13 July 2026 by Inspector Andrew Boughton, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.
Erection of 2no. gazebos to front elevation, extension to existing front/side patio and associated balustrade and access ramp (part retrospective)
- Authority
- Warwick
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- leisure-sport
- Inspector
- Andrew Boughton
- Postcode
- CV8 3BD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the Bubbenhall Conservation Area
- The effect of the development upon highway safety
- The effect of the development upon living conditions
What decided it
The development qualifies as not-inappropriate development in the Green Belt under paragraph 154(g) of the Framework as redevelopment of previously developed land with no significant impact on openness, and subject to detailed conditions regarding balustrading and parking layout, would preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area and cause no harm to highway safety or living conditions.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DS18Policy DS14Policy HE1Policy TR1Policy TR3Policy BE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 September 20266011601Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
- Dismissed23 September 20266006637Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
- Allowed27 July 20266004371South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR
- Allowed21 July 20266007706Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
- Allowed8 July 20263368738Land South of The Tan House, Old Warwick Road, Kingswood, Warwickshire, B94 6JZ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®