Planning appeal decision
Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
Planning appeal 6007706 at Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB (Warwick) was allowed on 21 July 2026 by Inspector K Townend, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development, with particular regard to its relationship to the existing settlement.
Permission in Principle for the erection of 1 no. self -build dwelling
- Authority
- Warwick
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- K Townend
- Postcode
- B94 6HB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, the proposed land use, and the amount of development, with particular regard to its relationship to the existing settlement
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
What decided it
The site qualifies as grey belt land under paragraph 155 of the Framework, does not conflict with Green Belt purposes, and the Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, making the proposal suitable for residential development.
The conflict with Policy H1 was outweighed by the demonstrable unmet housing need (1.96-year supply), the site's status as grey belt land, and its sustainability as a location for a single self-build dwelling.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H1Policy DS18
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 110Paragraph 115
- Judgments
- Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling BC & others [2017] EWCA Civ 1314
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 September 20266011601Quince Cottage, 4 The Bank, Stoneleigh, CV8 3DA
- Dismissed23 September 20266006637Land off Oakdene Crescent, Hatton, Warwick, CV35 7BN
- Dismissed5 August 20266007792Kenilworth Manor Nursing Home, Thickthorn Close, Kenilworth, CV8 2AF
- Allowed27 July 20266004371South Side, Wharf Lane, Lapworth, B94 6NR
- Allowed13 July 20266003642The Three Horseshoes, Spring Hill, Bubbenhall, CV8 3BD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®