Planning appeal decision
Land To The South Of Church Farm, Somersham, IP8 4PN, And Land To The East Of The Channel, Burstall, IP8 4JL In Suffolk, Burstall Hill, IP8 4LJ
Planning appeal 3319970 at Land To The South Of Church Farm, Somersham, IP8 4PN, And Land To The East Of The Channel, Burstall, IP8 4JL In Suffolk, Burstall Hill, IP8 4LJ (Mid Suffolk District Council) was allowed on 29 August 2023 by Inspector Parker C, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land.
Installation of renewable energy generating station, comprising ground-mounted photovoltaic solar arrays and battery-based electricity storage containers together with substation, inverter/transformer stations, site accesses, internal access tracks, security measures, access gates, other ancillary infrastructure, landscaping and biodiversity enhancements including Nature Areas
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- utilities-energy · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Parker C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the economic and other benefits of the best and most versatile agricultural land
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the countryside, including on the Special Landscape Area and users of nearby Public Rights of Way
- The effect of the proposal on heritage assets, including archaeology
- Whether benefits presented in support of the scheme outweigh any harms identified, and the overall planning balance
What decided it
The extremely limited and time-limited harm to landscape, visual amenity, character and appearance was clearly outweighed by the benefits of renewable energy generation, economic benefits and biodiversity gains.
the positive weight attaching to the benefits of the proposal (renewable energy, economic benefits, biodiversity gains and soil improvement) clearly outweighed the extremely limited harm to landscape, visual impacts, character and appearance, and the proposal accords with the development plan as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Saved Policy CL11Policy CL2Policy CS5Policy CS 3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 55Paragraph 56Paragraph 158Paragraph 174Paragraph 175
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Allowed5 August 20266007731Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
- Allowed18 June 20266006248Old Wood Hall, Great Green, Thrandeston, Diss, IP21 4BN
- Dismissed16 June 20266006837Barn Owl Campsite, Felsham Road, Rattlesden, IP30 0SG
- Dismissed16 June 20266006315Orchard House, Cocks Road, Eye, IP23 7NT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®