Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld1 July 20243319986

The Gallops Elm Lane, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM1 4NJ

Planning appeal 3319986 at The Gallops Elm Lane, Roxwell, Chelmsford, CM1 4NJ (Chelmsford Borough Council) was dismissed on 1 July 2024 by Inspector Steen A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

without planning permission, the construction of a car port, a building, and a hard surface

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Steen A
Postcode
CM1 4NJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development comprises inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • Whether the proposal would preserve the setting of the listed building
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm and heritage harm to the listed building setting is not clearly outweighed by other considerations sufficient to demonstrate very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S11Policy DM6Policy S3Policy DM13Policy DM23
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chelmsford City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice upheld3 August 20263347259
    Land at The House, East Hanningfield Road, Sandon, Chelmsford, Essex, CM2 7TQ
  2. Planning permission granted28 July 20263337730
    Former Tennis Pavillion , The Old Rodney , Spring Elms Lane, Little Baddow, Chelmsford , CM3 4SD
  3. Dismissed28 July 20266007350
    Phillips Farm, Highwood Road, Highwood, CM1 3PX
  4. Split Decision1 July 20263377239
    Highfields Farm Barn, Highfields Mead, East Hanningfield, Chelmsford , Essex, CM3 8AW
  5. Dismissed18 May 20266006009
    Emilie, Stock Road, Ingatestone, CM4 9PQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.