Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 February 20243320079

Plot adjacent to 99 Wild Hill, Teversal, Sutton in Ashfield, NG17 3JE

erection of 2 new two-storey dwellings with single garage and 2 parking bays

Authority
Ashfield District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hughes L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on ecology
  • the effect of the proposed development on trees and woodlands

What decided it

The absence of adequate Ecological and Arboricultural reports meant the adverse impacts on ecology, trees and woodlands could not be properly assessed and significantly and demonstrably outweighed the housing benefits.

The significant harm to ecology and trees and woodlands, which could not be adequately assessed, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery and economic activity, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 99

Plan policies cited: Policy ST1, Policy EV8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.