Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 February 20243320268

32 Station Road, Tiptree, Essex, CO5 0AZ

demolition of existing structures and construction of two new bungalows

Authority
Colchester Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether suitable living conditions would be provided for future occupiers of the proposed bungalows
  • the effect on living conditions for occupiers of neighbouring properties

What decided it

The harmful effect on the character and appearance of the area through the introduction of cramped massing in the rear garden setting, combined with the failure to provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers due to limited and overlooked amenity space, outweighed the modest housing contribution in an area with a demonstrable five-year housing land supply.

The modest benefits of housing supply and more efficient use of land did not outweigh the harm to the living conditions of future occupiers and the character and appearance of the area, particularly given the Council's ability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

Framework references: 128, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy SP7 of the North Essex Authorities' Shared Strategic Section 1 Plan 2021, Policy DM15 of the Colchester Borough Local Plan Section 2 2022, Policy DM12 of the Colchester Borough Local Plan Section 2 2022, Policy DM19 of the Colchester Borough Local Plan Section 2 2022, Policy TIP02 of the Tiptree Neighbourhood Plan 2023

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.