Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 June 20233320353

113 Elgin Crescent, LONDON, W11 2JF

construction of mansard roof extension with dormer at rear

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marshall E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the host property, terrace and wider Ladbroke Conservation Area with regard to design, scale and size

What decided it

The cumulative impact of the enlarged dormer combined with the new mansard roof would result in less than substantial harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, with only private benefits to the householder and no public benefits to weigh against this harm.

Framework references: 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy CL1, Policy CL2, Policy CL3, Policy CL6, Policy CL8, Policy CL11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.