Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 December 20233321534

4 The Orchards, Oxton, Nottinghamshire, NG25 0SY

the “demolition of existing garage, front conservatory/utility and rear porch. Proposed erection of 2-storey side extension and single-storey rear extension

Authority
Newark & Sherwood District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Pearce S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property, and whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Oxton Conservation Area
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposed extensions would result in disproportionate additions to the original building in terms of scale, bulk, massing and footprint, constituting inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm its openness, and the absence of harm to the conservation area and host property could only be treated as neutral factors that did not clearly outweigh this substantial harm.

Framework references: 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Spatial Policy 4B, Core Policy 9, Core Policy 14, Policy DM5, Policy DM6, Policy DM9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.