Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld16 April 20243321857

78 Floriston Avenue, Uxbridge, UB10 9EB

Planning appeal 3321857 at 78 Floriston Avenue, Uxbridge, UB10 9EB (London Borough of Hillingdon) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 16 April 2024 by Inspector Hawkins S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether suitable living conditions are provided for existing and future occupiers of the additional self-contained residential unit, having regard to internal floorspace and private outdoor amenity space.

without planning permission, the material change of use of a single-family dwelling house into two separate self- contained residential units (‘the breach’)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hawkins S
Postcode
UB10 9EB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether suitable living conditions are provided for existing and future occupiers of the additional self-contained residential unit, having regard to internal floorspace and private outdoor amenity space
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The effect on highway safety, having regard to the provision made for off-street vehicle parking

What decided it

The additional unit does not provide suitable living conditions for existing and future occupiers due to restrictive internal living space falling well short of Development Plan standards and the complete absence of private outdoor amenity space, which carries significant weight and outweighs the modest benefits of increased housing supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DMP Policy DMHB 16DMP Policy DMHB 18DMP Policy DMH 4DMP Policy DMT 2DMP Policy DMT 6LP Policy D6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

281 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed7 August 20266005469
    10 Lawn Avenue, West Drayton, UB7 7AQ
  2. Dismissed23 July 20266004329
    14 Willow Tree Lane, Hayes, UB4 9BB
  3. Dismissed16 July 20266005866
    11 Maygoods View, High Road, Uxbridge, UB8 2HG
  4. Dismissed8 July 20266007587
    79 Fairholme Crescent, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8QU
  5. Dismissed12 June 20266002695
    96 Oakdene Road, Hillingdon, UB10 0SQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.