Planning appeal decision
Land North Of Highgrove Farm, Main Road, Bosham, West Sussex
Planning appeal 3322020 at Land North Of Highgrove Farm, Main Road, Bosham, West Sussex (Chichester District Council) was allowed on 9 November 2023 by Inspector Baugh-Jones H, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for highways infrastructure with particular regard to the A27.
Construction of 300 dwellings (including 90 affordable dwellings), community hall, public open space, associated works and 2 no. accesses from the A259 (one temporary for construction)
- Authority
- Chichester District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Baugh-Jones H
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for highways infrastructure with particular regard to the A27
- Whether the proposal would make adequate provision for local recreational and travel infrastructure
- The effects on the Chichester Harbour and Solent Maritime Special Areas of Conservation with particular regard to nitrates
- The effects on the Singleton and Cocking Tunnels Special Area of Conservation with regard to protected species
- The effects on the character and appearance of the area including having regard to the Chichester Harbour Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
What decided it
The absence of any significant harm on the main issues (highways, European sites, and only limited landscape harm), combined with the Council's housing land supply shortfall and the substantial benefits of the scheme, meant no adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under paragraph 11d) of the Framework.
The significant benefits of housing delivery (including affordable housing), community facilities, and economic benefits, together with limited weight from the emerging allocation and significant weight from compliance with the Interim Housing Statement, outweighed the limited harm to character and appearance and the loss of some Best and Most Versatile agricultural land, such that no adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework or the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 8Policy 49Policy 50Policy 6Policy 7 (Bosham Neighbourhood Plan)Policy 34Policy 33Policy 52Policy 54Policy 39Policy A11 (emerging Local Plan)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 110Paragraph 111Paragraph 11Paragraph 57
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Chichester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed18 September 20233318548G & R Harris Ltd, Main Road, Nutbourne, Chichester, PO18 8RL
- Dismissed23 October 20266009623Friars House, 52a East Street, Chichester, PO19 1JG
- Dismissed15 October 20266010948Pendrills, Mill Lane, Fishbourne, PO19 3JN
- Dismissed5 October 202660118508 Gloucester Way, Chichester, PO19 5DL
- Dismissed2 October 202660116151, Harberton Crescent, Chichester, PO19 5NY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®