Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 January 20243322144

81-83 Wimbledon Hill Road, London, SW19 7QS

Planning appeal 3322144 at 81-83 Wimbledon Hill Road, London, SW19 7QS (London Borough of Merton) was dismissed on 25 January 2024 by Inspector Miles H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing occupiers with particular regard to daylight and sunlight and any overbearing effect.

Demolition of existing building and erection of a five storey residential block comprising 18 self contained flats (1x3 Bed, 15x2 Bed, 2x1 Bed), plus 1 dwellinghouse arranged over 2 floors (ground floor and basement)

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Miles H
Postcode
SW19 7QS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing occupiers with particular regard to daylight and sunlight and any overbearing effect.
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

What decided it

The substantial harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers from inadequate daylight/sunlight and an unacceptably overbearing effect significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the scheme.

the substantial harm to living conditions significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits and limited affordable housing benefits, even under the tilted balance

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM D2Policy D3Policy CS 14Policy CS8Policy SI1Policy CS20Policy DM T3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

259 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Merton

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed11 March 20263375275
    74A College Road, London, SW19 2BS
  2. Dismissed29 January 20263362545
    26 Marlowe Square , London, CR4 1DT
  3. Dismissed22 December 20253371051
    Development Site Between 6 And 8 Bordesley Road, Morden, SM4 5LR
  4. Dismissed18 November 20253368173
    The Trafalgar, 23 High Path, Colliers Wood, Merton, London, SW19 2JY
  5. Dismissed20 October 20253367044
    34-40 Morden Road, South Wimbledon, London, SW19 3BJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.