Planning appeal decision
2, 4 & 4A Boyn Valley Road, Maidenhead, SL6 4ED
Planning appeal 3322145 at 2, 4 & 4A Boyn Valley Road, Maidenhead, SL6 4ED (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 16 February 2024 by Inspector Phillips B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
the demolition of existing buildings to provide 10 maisonette style units in two structures
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Phillips B
- Postcode
- SL6 4ED
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupants of Nos 6 and 6A Boyn Valley Road, with respect to outlook and privacy
- whether the proposal provides adequate living conditions for future occupiers, with respect to the outlook and the provision of outdoor space
- the effect of the development on highway safety
- whether the proposal would meet sustainability and carbon reduction requirements
What decided it
The cumulative harm to character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, future occupier amenity, highway safety, and lack of demonstrated sustainability compliance meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan and the identified benefits were insufficient to justify permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP1Policy QP3Policy SP2Policy H03Policy IF2Principle 6.5Principle 7.6Principle 8.2Principle 8.5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 July 20266008433Jones House, High Street, Bray, SL6 2AH
- Allowed15 July 20266005399Land South of Garden Cottage, Fifield Road, Fifield, SL6 2NZ
- Dismissed13 May 2026600317431 Temple Road, Windsor, SL4 1HP
- Dismissed11 March 202633717785 Llanvair Drive, Ascot, Windsor And Maidenhead, SL5 9HS
- Dismissed10 March 20266002014Salon 227 227 Coppermill Road, Wraysbury, Staines, TW19 5NW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®