Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 March 20243322262

Crete House, The Beeches Dappers Lane, Angmering, LITTLEHAMPTON, BN16 4EN

extension of existing dwelling (Crete House) and erection of two detached dwelling on vacant plot to the south, together with new shared access, car parking and landscaping

Authority
Arun District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hobbs J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of Plot 1, with particular regard to outlook and privacy, and occupiers of Crete House, with particular regard to the provision of external space
  • whether it has been demonstrated that the proposal would not increase flood risk elsewhere and the proposed houses would be safe from flooding
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to parking provision

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole, particularly regarding character and appearance, living conditions, and flood risk, and the material considerations do not indicate the appeal should be decided other than in accordance with the development plan.

The housing supply benefits and economic benefits of construction attracted considerable weight, but the significant weight given to conflicts with development plan policies on character and appearance, residential amenity, and flood risk outweighed these benefits, and the tilted balance was not engaged due to flood risk protections in paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.

Framework references: 11, 225

Plan policies cited: Policy D DM1, Policy D SP1, Policy QE SP1, Policy W DM2, Policy W DM3, Policy T SP1, Policy HD5, Policy HD6, Policy HD7, Policy HD8

Judgments cited: Holborn Studio Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.