Planning appeal decision
Crete House, The Beeches Dappers Lane, Angmering, Littlehampton, BN16 4EN
Planning appeal 3322262 at Crete House, The Beeches Dappers Lane, Angmering, Littlehampton, BN16 4EN (Arun District Council) was dismissed on 14 March 2024 by Inspector Hobbs J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
extension of existing dwelling (Crete House) and erection of two detached dwelling on vacant plot to the south, together with new shared access, car parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Arun District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hobbs J
- Postcode
- BN16 4EN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of Plot 1, with particular regard to outlook and privacy, and occupiers of Crete House, with particular regard to the provision of external space
- whether it has been demonstrated that the proposal would not increase flood risk elsewhere and the proposed houses would be safe from flooding
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, with particular regard to parking provision
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan taken as a whole, particularly regarding character and appearance, living conditions, and flood risk, and the material considerations do not indicate the appeal should be decided other than in accordance with the development plan.
The housing supply benefits and economic benefits of construction attracted considerable weight, but the significant weight given to conflicts with development plan policies on character and appearance, residential amenity, and flood risk outweighed these benefits, and the tilted balance was not engaged due to flood risk protections in paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D DM1Policy D SP1Policy QE SP1Policy W DM2Policy W DM3Policy T SP1Policy HD5Policy HD6Policy HD7Policy HD8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 225
- Judgments
- Holborn Studio Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Arun District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed14 August 20266003625Land West of Brook Lane and South of A259, Angmering, Angmering, BN16 3JL
- Allowed5 August 20266003864HM Ford Open Prison, Ford Road, Ford, BN18 0BX
- Dismissed17 April 20263374471Land South of Ancton Lane, Middleton-on-Sea, PO22 6NB
- Planning permission granted2 March 2026336050527 North Ham Road, Littlehampton, BN17 7AS
- Allowed24 December 20253368245Land to the North of Lake Lane, Barnham, West Sussex, PO22 0AJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®