Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 October 20233322520

111 Long Lane, Ickenham, Uxbridge, UB10 8QS

Planning appeal 3322520 at 111 Long Lane, Ickenham, Uxbridge, UB10 8QS (London Borough of Hillingdon) was allowed on 10 October 2023 by Inspector Hickey A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area with particular regard to the appeal site's location within the Ickenham Village Conservation Area.

replacement of the existing conservatory with a rear extension. Erection of a ground floor side/rear extension, erection of a first floor side/rear extension. Conversion of side garage for habitable use. Conversion of roof space to habitable use to include a rear dormer and side rooflights

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hickey A
Postcode
UB10 8QS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area with particular regard to the appeal site's location within the Ickenham Village Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at No 113 Long Lane with particular regard to outlook, visual intrusion and light

What decided it

The proposed extensions, through their setback positioning, subservient design and the existing boundary treatments at No 113, would preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area whilst avoiding material harm to neighbouring living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
BE1HE1DMHB1DMHB4DMHB11DMHB12DMHD1D1D3D4HC1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

392 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266015310
    4 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266009856
    18-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266011782
    25 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266011268
    364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
  5. Allowed6 October 20266013858
    88 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.