Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 February 20243322575

Area of Footpath, Kilworth Street, Sudden, Castleton Rochdale, OL11 3PJ

described on the application form as ‘proposed 5G telecoms installation: H3G 20m street pole and additional equipment cabinets

Authority
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Change of use
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether any harm to character and appearance would be outweighed by the need to site the installation in the location proposed, having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the siting and scale of the 20m street pole was not outweighed by the telecommunications benefits, particularly because the appellant failed to demonstrate that suitable alternative sites had been comprehensively assessed.

Framework references: 118, 119, 121

Plan policies cited: Policy P1, Policy P3, Policy DM1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.