Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 February 20243322575

Area of Footpath, Kilworth Street, Sudden, Castleton Rochdale, OL11 3PJ

Planning appeal 3322575 at Area of Footpath, Kilworth Street, Sudden, Castleton Rochdale, OL11 3PJ (Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 February 2024 by Inspector Ollerenshaw M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

described on the application form as ‘proposed 5G telecoms installation: H3G 20m street pole and additional equipment cabinets

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Change of use
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M
Postcode
OL11 3PJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether any harm to character and appearance would be outweighed by the need to site the installation in the location proposed, having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the siting and scale of the 20m street pole was not outweighed by the telecommunications benefits, particularly because the appellant failed to demonstrate that suitable alternative sites had been comprehensively assessed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy P1Policy P3Policy DM1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 118Paragraph 119Paragraph 121

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

82 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed19 October 20266014994
    19 Town House Road, Littleborough, Rochdale, OL15 9BG
  2. Dismissed25 September 20266013635
    22 Hawthorn Road, Rochdale, OL11 5JQ
  3. Dismissed2 September 20266004977
    77 Long Street, Middleton, M24 6UN
  4. Allowed30 July 20266005921
    Hollingworth Heights, Peanock Lane, Littleborough, OL15 0AD
  5. Dismissed18 June 20266005050
    Harwood Street Garage, Harwood Street, Littleborough, Rochdale, OL15 8NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.