Planning appeal decision
Tamworth Farm, Dean Oak Lane, Leigh, Reigate, RH2 8PY
Planning appeal 3322806 at Tamworth Farm, Dean Oak Lane, Leigh, Reigate, RH2 8PY (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 8 March 2024 by Inspector Buchanan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to local and national planning policy.
creation of 3 No. dwellings following demolition of existing barns; revised application further to permission granted under MO/2022/0439 for conversion of existing buildings into 3 dwellings following demolition of lean-to extensions
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Buchanan R
- Postcode
- RH2 8PY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to local and national planning policy
- if it is inappropriate development, its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- its effect on the character and appearance of the area
- its effect on a protected species, namely great crested newts
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, or any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations to amount to very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and character, with inadequate protection for great crested newts, and the extant permission already delivers the same number of dwellings so there is no net housing benefit to outweigh these harms.
Although the Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply and the tilted balance is engaged, the absence of net housing gain due to the extant permission, combined with substantial harm to the Green Belt and significant harm to character and appearance and protected species, means the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply and the benefits do not outweigh the harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1(3)Policy CS13Policy CS14Policy CS15Policy ENV4Policy ENV15Policy ENV22Policy ENV23Policy ENV24
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 99
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®