Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 April 20243323181

85A High Street, Earls Colne, Colchester, CO6 2QX

Planning appeal 3323181 at 85A High Street, Earls Colne, Colchester, CO6 2QX (Braintree District Council) was dismissed on 19 April 2024 by Inspector Burston J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development and works on the special architectural and historic interest of 85a High Street, as a curtilage building of the Grade II Listed 83 & 85 High Street, and the setting of the Listed group.

a two storey side extension

Authority
Braintree District Council
Appeal type
other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Burston J
Postcode
CO6 2QX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development and works on the special architectural and historic interest of 85a High Street, as a curtilage building of the Grade II Listed 83 & 85 High Street, and the setting of the Listed group
  • Whether the character or appearance of the Earls Colne Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the existing, any future and adjacent occupiers

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the listed building caused by the disproportionate and visually dominating extension, which could not be justified by the limited public benefits of the scheme, outweighed any potential advantages.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LPP36SP7LPP52LPP57LPP53
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

18 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Braintree District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266008511
    Rose Cottage Church Road, Terling, CM3 2PH
  2. Dismissed20 October 20266008541
    61 Aparthotel At Kings Road, Halstead, CO9 1HA
  3. Dismissed12 October 20266014774
    Land South of Pen-Lan, Bures, CO8 5DL
  4. Dismissed12 October 20266012749
    9 Kemsley Road, Earls Colne, CO6 2NU
  5. Dismissed9 October 20266006918
    Wards Farm, Gladfen Hall Road, Greenstead Green, CO9 1RN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.