Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed9 November 20233323207

225-227 and 229-231, Kensington High Street, London, W8 6SA

Planning appeal 3323207 at 225-227 and 229-231, Kensington High Street, London, W8 6SA (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was allowed on 9 November 2023 by Inspector Caines A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Edwardes Square, Scarsdale and Abingdon Conservation Area.

upwards extensions of the buildings to provide additional hotel accommodation, use of ground floor as café, retail and hotel lobby and associated improvement to shop frontages, use of basement as additional hotel floorspace and reconfiguration of the existing hotel bedrooms

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Caines A
Postcode
W8 6SA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Edwardes Square, Scarsdale and Abingdon Conservation Area
  • Whether the setting of the nearby grade II listed Our Lady of Victories Roman Catholic Church would be preserved

What decided it

The proposed rear addition would be a suitable and appropriate addition to the host building and streetscape, preserving the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of the listed church through careful proportional design and its subservient relationship to the main building.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CL1Policy CL2Policy CL3Policy CL4Policy CL9Policy CL11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 802 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929
    Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
  2. Allowed23 June 20263362698
    Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
  3. Dismissed15 June 20266001948
    Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ
  4. Dismissed2 June 20263376699
    Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266003102
    Kensington High Street, Outside No. 254, London, W8 6ND

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.