Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 July 20243324295

Padd Farm, Hurst Lane, Egham, Surrey, TW20 8QJ

the erection of 2 new buildings, the retention of 1 x residential dwelling and the refurbishment of 2 existing buildings to be used as offices, a training centre and fabrication bays as part of the applicant’s corporate headquarters following the demolition of all remaining buildings on site. Refurbishment and decontamination of existing site and creation of open grassed area with an area of landscaped open space

Authority
Runnymede Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Grierson E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • would the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm be clearly outweighed by other consideration so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness through inappropriate development, particularly the visual impact of larger new buildings and extended hardstanding for outdoor storage, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations advanced by the appellant.

Framework references: 85, 152, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy EE19

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.