Planning appeal decision
Acacia Farm, Woodlands Drive, Rawdon, Leeds, BD10 0PT
Planning appeal 3324296 at Acacia Farm, Woodlands Drive, Rawdon, Leeds, BD10 0PT (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 2 November 2023 by Inspector Walker R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
the change of use of agricultural buildings to form three new dwellings; Demolition of existing barn, cattle shed and outbuilding; Associated alterations including new windows and doors, new roof lights, single storey extensions and new flat roof to stables building, new timber cladding and balcony with stairs to lower barn, erection of new detached garage outbuildings and lambing shed, alterations to re-instate access
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- other · Listed Building Consent & Conservation Area Consent Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Walker R
- Postcode
- BD10 0PT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- Whether the proposal would preserve a Grade II listed building or its setting, known as Acacia Farm, including farm buildings and farmhouse, and any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Rawdon Cragg Wood Conservation Area
- The effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding Special Landscape Area
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt with visual harm to openness, would fail to preserve the Grade II listed building's special interest through harmful domestic alterations, and the public benefits would not clearly outweigh the combined harm to Green Belt, heritage assets and Special Landscape Area.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy N33Policy GB4Policy GP5Policy N15Policy N17Policy N19Policy N23Policy N24Policy N25Policy N36Policy N37Policy N37APolicy P10Policy P11Policy P12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 174Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 201Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed24 July 20266006233Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®