Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 November 20233324578

78 ROSEVILLE RD, UB3 4QZ

a first floor rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
De Freitas Terceiro P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and of the area
  • whether the proposal would create satisfactory living conditions for its future occupiers with regard to outdoor space

What decided it

The substantial size and design of the proposed extension, particularly the hipped roof creating a disparity of angles with the main roof, would be harmful to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area, conflicting with development plan policies on design quality.

Plan policies cited: Policy DMHD1, Policy DMHB11, Policy DMHB12, Policy BE1, Policy D4, Policy D8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.