Planning appeal decision
The Anchorage The Street, Rickinghall, Diss, IP22 1DY
Planning appeal 3324776 at The Anchorage The Street, Rickinghall, Diss, IP22 1DY (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 16 February 2024 by Inspector Fleming L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the special architectural and historic interest of the grade II listed The Anchorage and the character and appearance of the area bearing in mind it would be within the Botesdale and Rickinghall Conservation Area and within the setting of the grade II listed Jessamine Lodge.
a single storey rear extension to existing dwelling. Remove existing section of roof and replace with shallower lean-to roof
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Fleming L
- Postcode
- IP22 1DY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the proposal on the special architectural and historic interest of the grade II listed The Anchorage and the character and appearance of the area bearing in mind it would be within the Botesdale and Rickinghall Conservation Area and within the setting of the grade II listed Jessamine Lodge
- Ecology
What decided it
The harm to the special architectural and historic interest of the listed building and Conservation Area, combined with the unresolved risk of harm to protected species in the absence of an ecology survey, outweighed the modest public benefits of the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LP03Policy LP16Policy LP19Policy LP24Policy LP15
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 205Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed15 October 20266012038The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
- Dismissed14 September 202660102811 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
- Dismissed8 September 20266010228Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
- Dismissed2 September 20263359620Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
- Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®