Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed23 February 20243324791

Cashino, 62 East Street, Barking, Barking and Dagenham, IG11 8EQ

the change of use to amusement centre with ancillary retail sales and catering without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 18/00415/FUL, dated 6 June 2018

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Savage K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the disputed opening hours condition meets the six tests for planning conditions, having regard to the living conditions of nearby residents and crime prevention

What decided it

The evidence demonstrated that 24-hour opening would not lead to demonstrable harm to amenity through noise, disturbance, anti-social behaviour or crime, and therefore the opening hours condition was no longer necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms.

Framework references: 56

Plan policies cited: Policy BP8, Policy D11, Policy BC7, Policy CP3, Policy SPP1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.