Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 March 20263370715

82 Holgate Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM10 8NB

Planning appeal 3370715 at 82 Holgate Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM10 8NB (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 27 March 2026 by Inspector James A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal layout, outlook, daylight, noise and outdoor amenity space.

Conversion of the existing C3 dwelling into two 1xbed flats involving the addition of two ground floor side doors

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
James A
Postcode
RM10 8NB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to internal layout, outlook, daylight, noise and outdoor amenity space
  • the effect of the proposed development on the supply of family housing within the area

What decided it

The poor design and inadequate living conditions for future occupiers, combined with the net loss of family housing, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited housing supply benefit when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

the adverse impacts of poor design and loss of family housing significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefit of one additional dwelling to housing supply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SP2DMD1DMSI3D6D14SP3H1H2H10H9DMH5SPDG1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 139

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

290 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed8 May 20266002379
    33 Sandown Avenue, Dagenham, RM10 8XD
  2. Dismissed13 April 20266002839
    22 Whitebarn Lane, Dagenham, RM10 9LH
  3. Notice varied and upheld27 March 20263340354
    197 Broad Street, Dagenham, RM10 9JD
  4. Allowed10 February 20263373141
    15 Ethel Cottages, Padnall Road, Chadwell Heath, Essex, RM6 5JB
  5. Allowed1 December 20253344225
    1, Longview Villas Collier Row Road RM5 2BS, Romford, Essex, RM5 2BS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.