Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 March 20243325047

Coppins Cottage, Clay Lane, eye, suffolk, IP23 7DZ

erection of conservatory to existing single storey extension, alterations to fenestration and erection of porch (following demolition of existing external store

Authority
Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Fleming L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development/works would preserve the grade II listed building Waysmeet or its setting and any features of special architectural or historic interest that it possesses

What decided it

The proposals would cause less than substantial harm to the significance of the grade II listed building, and the absence of public benefits (including securing optimum viable use) meant this harm could not be outweighed.

Framework references: 205, 208

Plan policies cited: LP03, LP19

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.