Planning appeal decision
Plot 1a, Oaklands Farm / Park, Glaziers Lane, Normandy, Guildford, GU3 2SF
Planning appeal 3325063 at Plot 1a, Oaklands Farm / Park, Glaziers Lane, Normandy, Guildford, GU3 2SF (Guildford Borough Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 14 March 2024 by Inspector Orr H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the operational development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it.
(i) The making of a material change of use to the use of the land for residential purposes through the stationing of caravans; (ii) The erection on the land of three buildings, gate and fencing; (iii) The laying of hardsurfacing to facilitate the stationing of caravans and the development outlined in (i) and (ii) above. The requirements of the notice are: (i) Cease the residential use of the Land; (ii) Remove from the Land all caravans, vehicles, buildings, fencing, gates and all paraphernalia brought onto the Land to facilitate the residential use of the Land (iii) Dig up and remove all hardstanding from the Land; (iv) Remove from the Land all materials, rubble, rubbish and debris arising from steps (ii) to (iii) above; and (v) Reseed the Land with grass
- Authority
- Guildford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Orr H
- Postcode
- GU3 2SF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the operational development on the openness of the Green Belt and the purposes of including land within it
- The effect of the development on the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (TBHSPA)
- Whether the harm to the Green Belt and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the grant of planning permission
What decided it
The substantial harm from inappropriateness together with the additional moderate harm to openness was not clearly outweighed by the personal circumstances, the lack of alternative sites and other benefits, so very special circumstances were not established.
the substantial harm by reason of inappropriateness and the moderate additional loss of openness outweighed the personal circumstances of the appellant's family, the benefits of a settled base and the lack of alternative sites, such that very special circumstances did not exist
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142
- Judgments
- Turner v SSCLG & East Dorset Council [2016] EWCA Civ 466
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Guildford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- decided16 October 202660107129 Baldwin Crescent, Guildford, GU4 7XW
- Allowed15 October 20266008529Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
- Allowed14 October 20266009751Land South of Green Lane, West Horsley, GU23 6PQ
- Dismissed6 October 20266009810Hogs Back Farm Yard, Monkshatch, Compton, GU3 1DL
- Allowed5 October 20266012736The Cottage, Blanket Mill Farm, Goose Rye Road, Worplesdon, Guildford, GU3 3RQ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®