Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 April 20243325275

2a Lexham Mews, London, London, W8 6JW

Planning appeal 3325275 at 2a Lexham Mews, London, London, W8 6JW (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 19 April 2024 by Inspector Unwin N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the surrounding occupiers with particular regard to privacy.

Demolition, excavation to form a new underground floor level below the footprint of premises to provide additional residential floorspace; elevational alterations comprising the installation of replacement/new windows on the front (east) elevation; and the rendering and installation of new windows on the rear (west) elevation; and erection of an additional storey and a sunken roof terrace

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Unwin N
Postcode
W8 6JW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the surrounding occupiers with particular regard to privacy
  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Edwards Square/Scarsdale and Abingdon Conservation Area
  • whether the proposed demolition of the existing dwelling is sufficiently justified

What decided it

The unacceptable impact on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through overlooking and loss of privacy from the proposed additional storey and sunken roof terrace.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CL5Policy CE1Policy CL1Policy CL2Policy CL3Policy CL11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 828 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929
    Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
  2. Allowed23 June 20263362698
    Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
  3. Dismissed15 June 20266001948
    Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ
  4. Dismissed2 June 20263376699
    Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266003102
    Kensington High Street, Outside No. 254, London, W8 6ND

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.