Planning appeal decision
Hooves on the Hill, Brandon Crescent, Scarcroft, Leeds, LS17 9JH
Planning appeal 3325360 at Hooves on the Hill, Brandon Crescent, Scarcroft, Leeds, LS17 9JH (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 10 November 2023 by Inspector Teasdale N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt including its effect on the openness of the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
described as, ‘Replacement dwelling (alternative scheme to stable conversion LPA ref 20/04273/FU and new dwelling LPA ref 22/04558/FU)
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Teasdale N
- Postcode
- LS17 9JH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt including its effect on the openness of the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposed development would have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development due to extensive excavation, additional hardstanding, and the introduction of domestic paraphernalia in a currently undeveloped area, and no very special circumstances were demonstrated to outweigh this harm.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H2 of the Leeds City Council Core StrategyPolicy N33 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006)Policy H1 of the Bardsey cum Rigton Neighbourhood Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed24 July 20266006233Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®