Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 November 20233325539

320 Wood Lane, Rothwell, LEEDS, LS26 0PW

described as, ‘proposed new boundary fence with new pedestrian and vehicular access fronting Wood Lane

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Teasdale N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed lengthy and high boundary treatment would be visually prominent and incongruous in a street scene characterised by lower height enclosures and soft landscaping, thereby unacceptably harming the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds City Council Core Strategy (as amended by the Core Strategy Selective Review, 2019), Policy GP5 of the Leeds City Council Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy N25 of the Leeds City Council Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy HDG1 of the Leeds City Council Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document, 2012

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.