®Planning appeal decision
3 Ings View, Methley, LEEDS, LS26 9JZ
described as, ‘first floor extension to side over existing garage and utility to create one master bedroom
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Teasdale N
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing occupiers of No 46 Lower Mickletown with particular regard to outlook
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area
What decided it
The hip roof design falling away from the common boundary and the subordinate height of the extension, combined with existing screening, ensured the development would not cause unacceptable harm to neighbouring outlook or character and appearance.
Framework references: 12
Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Core Strategy, Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, Policy BD5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, Policy HDG1 of the Leeds City Council Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2012, Policy HDG2 of the Leeds City Council Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2012
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.