Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 March 20243325966

Land at Haggars Mead, Earl Stonham, Suffolk, IP14 5JA

Planning appeal 3325966 at Land at Haggars Mead, Earl Stonham, Suffolk, IP14 5JA (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 5 March 2024 by Inspector Billings C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the suitability of the site for the proposed residential development, having regard to development plan policies and the principles of sustainable development.

the erection of 10 dwellings including 6 affordable homes

Authority
Mid Suffolk District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Billings C
Postcode
IP14 5JA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the suitability of the site for the proposed residential development, having regard to development plan policies and the principles of sustainable development
  • whether a financial contribution towards school transport would be necessary to make the development acceptable

What decided it

The site is located in an unsuitable countryside location outside any settlement boundary that would not constitute windfall infill housing and lacks adequate public transport and services to support sustainable development, conflicting with Policies SP03 and LP01 of the adopted Joint Local Plan.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP03Policy LP01Policy LP07Policy SP09Policy LP16
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 80Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

6 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266012038
    The Stables, Bobby Hill, Wattisfield, IP22 1NL
  2. Dismissed14 September 20266010281
    1 Nursery Cottages, Barham, Ipswich, IP6 0PR
  3. Dismissed8 September 20266010228
    Land East of 52 Exeter Road, Claydon, Ipswich, IP6 0BP
  4. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.