Planning appeal decision
4 Greenways, Esher, KT10 0QD
Planning appeal 3325989 at 4 Greenways, Esher, KT10 0QD (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 22 July 2024 by Inspector Leonard S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would maximise the efficient use of urban land, in order to meet the Borough's identified housing need.
change of use from C2 to dwelling house C3, demolition of single storey extensions, new single storey extension to the rear and front elevation including a gabled elevation and new dormer and minor internal reconfiguration, severing of the site to provide a new 3-bedroom single dwelling house, associated landscaping, and parking
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Leonard S
- Postcode
- KT10 0QD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would maximise the efficient use of urban land, in order to meet the Borough's identified housing need
- Whether it is appropriate to develop the appeal site in isolation rather than as part of a comprehensive development
- Whether the proposal makes appropriate provision for affordable housing
- The impact of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of Nos 4 and 6 Manor Road South, with particular regard to outlook and daylight impacts
- Whether there is sufficient information to demonstrate that the proposal would not harm protected species and/or their habitats
- The impact of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The significant harms arising from impact on living conditions of No.4 Manor Road South, failure to maximise efficient use of urban land, failure to develop comprehensively, and lack of secured affordable housing contribution significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.
The modest benefits of two additional dwellings and economic benefits were outweighed by the significant harms to neighbouring living conditions, inefficient use of land at 16.7 dph against policy targets, failure to develop comprehensively, and lack of affordable housing contribution, such that the proposal was not sustainable development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS17Policy CS19Policy CS21Policy CS8Policy CS15Policy DM4Policy DM2Policy DM21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 60Paragraph 65Paragraph 70Paragraph 135
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 2026601339623 Avondale Avenue, Esher, KT10 0DB
- Dismissed21 October 2026601332769 Alexandra Road, Thames Ditton, KT7 0QS
- Dismissed16 October 20266008605Pavement Outside Tesco Stores Ltd, 108 - 118 Walton Road East Molesey, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Dismissed16 October 20266008598Pavement Outside Tesco Ltd, 108 – 118 Walton Road, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Allowed14 October 20266009254Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, KT10 9AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®