Planning appeal decision
Land at Wash Water, Newbury, Berkshire, RG20 0LS
Planning appeal 3326191 at Land at Wash Water, Newbury, Berkshire, RG20 0LS (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was allowed on 29 January 2024 by Inspector Prentis D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including any effect on the scenic quality of the adjacent North Wessex AONB.
Hybrid application for mixed use community of up to 270 dwellings (outline, up to 188 dwellings including older persons housing, a 1,600sqm community building, 1,200sqm health centre, 250sqm convenience store, demolition of Common Farm, open space, allotments, community gardens, riverside park/nature trail, drainage attenuation and landscaping) and a full application for 82 dwellings, public open space, landscaping, infrastructure and new vehicular access onto the A343 Andover Road
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Unknown
- Inspector
- Prentis D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including any effect on the scenic quality of the adjacent North Wessex AONB
- whether the detailed proposals for Phase 1 would meet the objective of achieving well-designed places
- whether the proposal would make satisfactory provision for public open space, children's play space and green infrastructure
- whether the appeal site is at a location that is or can be made sustainable, through limiting the need for travel and offering a genuine choice of transport modes
- whether the proposal is at risk of flooding and whether it would increase the risk of flooding elsewhere
- the nature and extent of any economic, social and environmental benefits
What decided it
The Inspector's conclusion that, notwithstanding conflict with the out-of-date spatial strategy and moderate landscape harm, the significant housing and other benefits meant the proposal accorded with the development plan as a whole.
the significant benefits of market and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate-weight benefits from open space, the convenience store, economic activity and improved transport choice, outweighed the moderate landscape and visual harm and the limited-weight conflict with the out-of-date spatial strategy, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits and the proposal accorded with the development plan as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy EM1Policy EM4Policy EM5Policy EM7Policy EM10Policy CN1Policy CN6Policy CN9Policy SD1Policy CN3Policy HO2Policy NE1Policy NE5Policy TT1Policy CF2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 79Paragraph 180Paragraph 226
- Judgments
- Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed26 October 2026600755075 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
- Dismissed13 October 20266011822Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011099Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL
- Dismissed6 August 20266007440Land West Of Millars, Station Road, Cliddesden, RG25 2FG
- Allowed10 July 20266004025Basingstoke Sports and Social Club, Fairfields Road, Basingstoke, RG21 3DR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®