Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed29 January 20243326191

Land at Wash Water, Newbury, Berkshire, RG20 0LS

Authority
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Unknown
Inspector
Prentis D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including any effect on the scenic quality of the adjacent North Wessex AONB
  • whether the detailed proposals for Phase 1 would meet the objective of achieving well-designed places
  • whether the proposal would make satisfactory provision for public open space, children's play space and green infrastructure
  • whether the appeal site is at a location that is or can be made sustainable, through limiting the need for travel and offering a genuine choice of transport modes
  • whether the proposal is at risk of flooding and whether it would increase the risk of flooding elsewhere
  • the nature and extent of any economic, social and environmental benefits

What decided it

The Inspector's conclusion that, notwithstanding conflict with the out-of-date spatial strategy and moderate landscape harm, the significant housing and other benefits meant the proposal accorded with the development plan as a whole.

the significant benefits of market and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate-weight benefits from open space, the convenience store, economic activity and improved transport choice, outweighed the moderate landscape and visual harm and the limited-weight conflict with the out-of-date spatial strategy, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits and the proposal accorded with the development plan as a whole

Framework references: 11, 79, 180, 226

Plan policies cited: Policy SS1, Policy SS6, Policy EM1, Policy EM4, Policy EM5, Policy EM7, Policy EM10, Policy CN1, Policy CN6, Policy CN9, Policy SD1, Policy CN3, Policy HO2, Policy NE1, Policy NE5, Policy TT1, Policy CF2

Judgments cited: Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.