Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent to the South Side of Berry Court Business Park, Bramley Road, Little London, Tadley, RG26 5AT
Planning appeal 3326212 at Land Adjacent to the South Side of Berry Court Business Park, Bramley Road, Little London, Tadley, RG26 5AT (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was allowed on 22 April 2024 by Inspector Rogers J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect that varying or removing the conditions would have on biodiversity, with particular regard to the Gypsy Lane Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC).
Change of use of land from agricultural to B8 use (storage) as an extension of Berry Court Business Park
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- employment-industrial · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Rogers J
- Postcode
- RG26 5AT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect that varying or removing the conditions would have on biodiversity, with particular regard to the Gypsy Lane Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC)
- the effect that varying or removing the conditions would have on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect that varying or removing the conditions would have on water quality and flooding
- the effect that varying or removing the conditions would have on safety of users of the site, with particular regard to contaminants
- the effect that varying or removing the conditions would have on the highway safety of users of Bramley Road
- the effect that varying or removing the conditions would have on the suitability of the site having regard to local planning policies on the location of economic development
- the effect that varying or removing the conditions would have on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to noise
What decided it
The Inspector's conclusion that the 20-metre buffer and associated conditions were necessary and reasonable to protect the biodiversity of the SINC and priority habitat, and that the development would not be prevented from operating by these requirements, was decisive in allowing the appeal with modified conditions.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EM1Policy EM4Policy EM6Policy EM7Policy EM10Policy EM12Policy SS1Policy EP4Policy CN9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 15
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed26 October 2026600755075 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
- Dismissed13 October 20266011822Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011099Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL
- Dismissed6 August 20266007440Land West Of Millars, Station Road, Cliddesden, RG25 2FG
- Allowed10 July 20266004025Basingstoke Sports and Social Club, Fairfields Road, Basingstoke, RG21 3DR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®