Planning appeal decision
Wigton Heath Farm, Manor House Lane, Alwoodley, Leeds, LS17 9JD
Planning appeal 3326446 at Wigton Heath Farm, Manor House Lane, Alwoodley, Leeds, LS17 9JD (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 25 October 2023 by Inspector Mulloy C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
change of use, extension and alteration of existing agricultural buildings to form two residential dwellings with associated parking, access and garden areas
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Mulloy C
- Postcode
- LS17 9JD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and the special landscape area
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety with particular reference to visibility at the proposed access point
- If the proposal is inappropriate development whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial weight given to the harm to Green Belt openness and purposes, and harm to the character of the Special Landscape Area, was not clearly outweighed by the modest benefits of housing supply and other considerations, such that very special circumstances could not be established.
The modest benefits of housing land supply contribution, biodiversity enhancements and economic benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial weight to be given to Green Belt harm by reason of inappropriateness, loss of openness and conflict with Green Belt purposes, and harm to the Special Landscape Area character, and the balance tipped decisively against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy N33Policy N37Policy N37APolicy H2Policy P10Policy P12Policy T2Policy GP5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 148Paragraph 147Paragraph 110Paragraph 111
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed13 October 20266011132Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Dismissed27 August 20266009680The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
- Allowed12 August 20266005793Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
- Dismissed24 July 20266006233Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®