Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of The Causeway, Ridgewell, Essex, CO9 4RT
Planning appeal 3326557 at Land to the South of The Causeway, Ridgewell, Essex, CO9 4RT (Braintree District Council) was dismissed on 8 January 2024 by Inspector Simpson L, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development with particular regard to access to services and facilities.
Outline planning permission with all matters reserved apart from access for development of up to 24 dwellings including details of access into and within the site, parking arrangements, garages, open space, landscaping, drainage measures and all other associated works
- Authority
- Braintree District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Simpson L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development with particular regard to access to services and facilities.
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety.
What decided it
The substantial harm from the site's poor accessibility to services/facilities combined with substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under the tilted balance.
the adverse impacts of granting permission (substantial weight to harm from poor locational sustainability and substantial weight to harm to character and appearance) significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits (collectively significant weight, comprising moderate weight to housing delivery and economic benefits, significant weight to 40% affordable housing, and moderate weight to open space/PRoW improvements and biodiversity net gain), so the appeal was dismissed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP3Policy LPP1Policy SP7Policy LPP42Policy LPP52Policy SP6Policy LPP47Policy SP1Policy DM1Policy DM9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 109Paragraph 116Paragraph 115
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Braintree District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 20266008511Rose Cottage Church Road, Terling, CM3 2PH
- Dismissed20 October 2026600854161 Aparthotel At Kings Road, Halstead, CO9 1HA
- Dismissed12 October 20266014774Land South of Pen-Lan, Bures, CO8 5DL
- Dismissed12 October 202660127499 Kemsley Road, Earls Colne, CO6 2NU
- Dismissed9 October 20266006918Wards Farm, Gladfen Hall Road, Greenstead Green, CO9 1RN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®