Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 April 20243326705

49 Marksbury Bottom, Marksbury, BATH, BA2 9HR

construction of new timber framed car port over existing car parking hard standing

Authority
Bath and North East Somerset Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
O'Doherty A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The proposed development would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with a disproportionate volume increase of 65% over the original building, and would reduce openness, with no very special circumstances to justify this harm.

Framework references: 142, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy GB3, Policy CP8, Policy GB2, Policy GB1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.