Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 April 20243327319

3 Spinney Gardens, DAGENHAM, RM9 5DR

the erection of a single storey front and side extension

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Deane G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host building and the local area

What decided it

The proposed extension would materially harm the character and appearance of the host building and local area, particularly by eroding the open character of the street scene and diminishing the significance of the Becontree Estate as a non-designated heritage asset.

Plan policies cited: Policy D4 of The London Plan, Policy CP2 of the Council's Planning for the future of Barking and Dagenham Core Strategy, Policy CP3 of the Council's Planning for the future of Barking and Dagenham Core Strategy, Policy BP2 of the Borough Wide Development Policies Development Plan Document, Policy BP8 of the Borough Wide Development Policies Development Plan Document, Policy BP11 of the Borough Wide Development Policies Development Plan Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.