Planning appeal decision
Pembroke Road, Ruislip, HA4 8NQ
Planning appeal 3327636 at Pembroke Road, Ruislip, HA4 8NQ (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 7 February 2024 by Inspector Carpenter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the effect on the significance of the Ruislip Village Conservation Area through development within its setting.
removal of the existing mansard roof, construction of additional two storeys along with front extensions and external alterations to create an additional 8 units with associated amenity
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Carpenter C
- Postcode
- HA4 8NQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the effect on the significance of the Ruislip Village Conservation Area through development within its setting
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular reference to outlook and light
- whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for existing and future residents of Neyland Court, with particular reference to external amenity space
- whether the proposal would provide a suitable mix of housing
What decided it
The proposal's failure to provide adequate external amenity space for future residents, combined with harmful effects on character and appearance, neighbouring living conditions, and housing mix, meant it conflicted with the development plan and no material considerations justified approval.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BE1Policy HE1Policy DMHB1Policy DMHB4Policy DMHB5Policy DMHB11Policy DMHB12Policy DMHB18Policy DMH2Policy HC1Policy D3Policy D4Policy D6Policy H10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed27 October 202660153104 Albany Close, Ickenham, UB10 8QW
- Dismissed27 October 2026600985618-20 Wilmar Close, Hayes, UB4 8ET
- Dismissed21 October 2026601178225 Stirling Road, Hayes, UB3 3AH
- Dismissed19 October 20266011268364 Victoria Road, Ruislip, HA4 0ET
- Allowed6 October 2026601385888 Stormount Drive, Hayes, UB3 1RH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®