Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 August 20243327662

Land Rear of 85, Queens Road, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 9UQ

Planning appeal 3327662 at Land Rear of 85, Queens Road, Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 9UQ (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 August 2024 by Inspector Hickey A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupiers.

change of use of existing commercial building to 2 residential units

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hickey A
Postcode
KT13 9UQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupiers
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of the host dwellings and neighbouring properties, with particular regard to demand for on-street parking
  • whether the proposal should be liable for a contribution towards affordable housing
  • whether or not the proposed development would provide adequate cycle parking
  • whether or not the proposed development would provide adequate waste and recycling facilities

What decided it

The proposal would fail to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupiers regarding outlook and private outdoor amenity space, and would harm neighbouring living conditions through increased on-street parking stress in an already constrained area.

The modest social and economic benefits of creating two dwellings and supporting local services did not outweigh the identified harms to living conditions of future occupiers and neighbours regarding outlook, amenity space, and parking stress.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM10Policy DM7Policy CS21Policy DM8
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

193 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed6 October 20266010653
    Land Rear Of 12-14 New Road, Esher, KT10 9PG
  2. Allowed3 September 20266007869
    Wild Flowers, Wren's Hill, Oxshott, KT22 0HN
  3. Allowed10 August 20266006033
    31 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD
  4. Allowed9 July 20266005552
    1a Carmalt Gardens, Hersham, KT12 5HQ
  5. Dismissed28 May 20266005939
    Nicholson House, 41 Thames Street, Weybridge, KT13 8JG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.