Planning appeal decision
239 Camden High Street, Camden, London, NW1 7BU
Planning appeal 3327715 at 239 Camden High Street, Camden, London, NW1 7BU (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 15 May 2024 by Inspector Catcheside E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the developments on the character and appearance of the host property and local area, with particular regard to the significance of the CTCA and the RCCA, through development within their settings.
one- and two-storey rear extensions to form two apartments above existing hot food takeaway
- Authority
- London Borough of Camden
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Catcheside E
- Postcode
- NW1 7BU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the developments on the character and appearance of the host property and local area, with particular regard to the significance of the CTCA and the RCCA, through development within their settings
- whether the proposed developments would provide an adequate standard of accommodation, with particular regard to the internal floor area within the proposed first-floor apartment
- whether the setting of the adjacent Grade II listed Arlington House would be preserved
- whether the proposals would comply with development plan policies in respect of parking and car-free development
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II listed Arlington House and the failure to meet minimum space standards for proposed apartments, which would not be outweighed by the modest public benefits of two additional housing units, and the clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework.
The modest social and economic benefits of delivering two housing units in a well-connected area with housing under-supply were given moderate weight but were insufficient to outweigh the great weight given to the conservation of the designated heritage asset (Grade II listed Arlington House), with less than substantial harm to its significance; the harm to heritage assets provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework, displacing the balance in favour of granting permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D1Policy H6Policy T2Policy DM1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 208
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Camden
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed29 September 20266008940Basement Flat, 226 Finchley Road, London, NW3 6DH
- Dismissed8 September 20266009503Leapman House, 59 Primrose Gardens, London, NW3 4UL
- Allowed15 July 2026600599712 Sarre Road, London, NW2 3SL
- Notice upheld22 June 20263370592Third Floor Flat, 18 Stukeley Street, London, London, WC2B 5LR
- Notice upheld22 June 20263370591Land at: Fourth-Fifth Floor Duplexes, 18 Stukeley Street, London, WC2B 5LR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®