®Planning appeal decision
Dismissed13 December 20233327725
17, Earlswood Common, Earlswood, solihull, B94 5SL
addition of first floor and pitched roofs to existing bungalow along with Permitted Development fallback position in rear garden
- Authority
- Stratford-on-Avon District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Pickernell E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt resulting in disproportionate additions and loss of openness, with no very special circumstances demonstrated to justify approval.
Framework references: 137, 147, 149
Plan policies cited: Policy CS.10
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.