Planning appeal decision
Little Bank Farm, Garlinge Green, Chilham, CT4 5RU
Planning appeal 3327878 at Little Bank Farm, Garlinge Green, Chilham, CT4 5RU (Canterbury City Council) was dismissed on 11 April 2024 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed agricultural building, having regard to national and local planning policies in respect of conserving and enhancing the landscape and scenic beauty of the Kent Downs National Landscape and economic need.
Change of use of part of agricultural land to keeping of horses and erection of agricultural building on agricultural land, with proposed pond
- Authority
- Canterbury City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- agricultural · Change of use
- Inspector
- Smith J
- Postcode
- CT4 5RU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the proposed agricultural building, having regard to national and local planning policies in respect of conserving and enhancing the landscape and scenic beauty of the Kent Downs National Landscape and economic need
What decided it
The visual intrusion and landscape harm caused by the proposed barn's scale and elevated siting in an isolated and exposed position on the valley slope, which would interrupt the characteristic landform and views of the Kent Downs National Landscape, outweighed the moderate economic benefits to the agricultural business.
The harm to landscape and scenic beauty of the Kent Downs National Landscape, to which great weight was attached, was not outweighed by the moderate weight given to economic need and environmental benefits
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DBE3Policy EMP13Policy LB1Policy LB2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 182Paragraph 88Paragraph 89
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Canterbury City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 September 20266008107Dane Cottage, Hoggs Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Dismissed28 September 20266008105Dane Cottage, Hogg Lane, Petham, CT4 5PJ
- Allowed24 September 2026601061482 Island Wall, Whitstable, CT5 1EL
- Allowed18 September 20266009081Ground Floor, 2 Douglas Road, Herne Bay, CT6 6AE
- Dismissed11 August 2026600962869 Joy Lane, Whitstable, CT5 4DD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®