Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 April 20243328026

10 Conifer Crescent, Lymington, Hampshire, SO41 8GF

for a flat roof single-storey rear extension up to 4.36m from the existing house rear wall. External width of 5.85m

Authority
New Forest District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Dickson R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed extension complies with the permitted development limitations under Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015, specifically the restriction that an extension cannot extend beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse and have a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse

What decided it

The proposed extension would extend beyond a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse and would extend the full width of the original dwellinghouse, thereby failing to comply with the permitted development limitations in Class A of the Order.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.