Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 October 20243328082

Land South of Kineton Road, Gaydon, CV35 0FL

the erection of 23 (16 local need) No’s 1, 2 and 3 bedroom dwelling houses and garages together with roads, sewers and associated external works

Authority
Stratford-on-Avon District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Plenty B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location taking into consideration local and national policy and local housing needs
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area including the setting of The Leys, a grade II listed building
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety with particular regard to visibility splays and visitor parking
  • The effect of the proposed development on flood risk and surface water drainage

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole on spatial location, character and appearance, heritage, highway safety and drainage, and the material considerations do not provide a compelling reason to deviate from the development plan.

The modest benefits of housing delivery, economic benefits during construction and occupation, and the provision of affordable housing were outweighed by the material conflicts with the development plan relating to spatial housing distribution, character and appearance, heritage asset setting, highway safety and flood risk.

Framework references: 48, 82, 135, 173

Plan policies cited: CS.15, AS.10, CS.5, CS.8, CS.9, CS.26, CS.4

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.