Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 April 20243328261

1 Linden Mews, London, W2 4HE

Planning appeal 3328261 at 1 Linden Mews, London, W2 4HE (Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea) was dismissed on 8 April 2024 by Inspector Manley N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and mews and whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Pembridge Conservation Area.

loft conversion involving three new conservation-type roof lights to the front roof and erection of two slate-clad rear dormers with white painted timber framed sash windows

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Manley N
Postcode
W2 4HE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and mews and whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Pembridge Conservation Area
  • The living conditions of the occupiers of properties to the rear boundary of the site, with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the historic roofscape and character of the Pembridge Conservation Area caused by the proposed dormers, with no public benefits to outweigh this harm, outweighed the absence of adverse effects on neighbouring living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CL1Policy CL2Policy CL3Policy CL5Policy CL6Policy CL8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 742 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Planning permission granted23 July 20263328929
    Flat 5, 69 Oxford Gardens, London, W10 5UJ
  2. Allowed23 June 20263362698
    Flat 1 at 28 Brunswick Gardens and Flat 2 at 30 Brunswick Gardens, London, W8 4AL
  3. Dismissed15 June 20266001948
    Land to End of Ledbury Mews West, London, W11 2QZ
  4. Dismissed2 June 20263376699
    Kings Road, Outside No. 395, London, SW10 0LR
  5. Dismissed19 May 20266003102
    Kensington High Street, Outside No. 254, London, W8 6ND

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.