Planning appeal decision
Land Adj. Pollards Oak Crescent, Hurst Green, Oxted, Surrey, RH8 0JG
Planning appeal 3328491 at Land Adj. Pollards Oak Crescent, Hurst Green, Oxted, Surrey, RH8 0JG (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 23 May 2024 by Inspector Pearce J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the siting and appearance of the proposed monopole would be acceptable having regard to the character and appearance of the area and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.
a telecommunications installation upgrade; existing EE/H3G 8.0m high replica telegraph pole to be removed and replaced with a proposed EE/H3G 18.0m high phase 7 monopole complete with wraparound cabinet and associated ancillary works
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Pearce J
- Postcode
- RH8 0JG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the siting and appearance of the proposed monopole would be acceptable having regard to the character and appearance of the area and if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The substantial height and thickness of the proposed monopole would harmfully contrast with the surrounding built environment and reduce the quality of the area's openness and consistency of scale, resulting in unacceptable harm to character and appearance that was not outweighed by the need for the installation or justified by evidence of alternative site exploration.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP18Policy DP6Policy DP7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 121
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed23 May 20243322976Area of Grass Verge, Land Opposite 105a New Farthingdale, Dormansland, Tandridge, Surrey, RH7 6RF
- Dismissed26 February 20243323332Area of Grass Verge, Barnfield Way, Holland Oxted, Tandridge Surrey, RH8 9BD
- Dismissed12 May 20233293519Ballards Lane Streetworks, Ballards Lane Grass Verge, Oxted, Surrey, RH8 0SL
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®