Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 May 20243328834

Lyncrest, Moorland Road, Bramhope, LEEDS, LS16 9HW

a two storey rear extension to match existing house with hipped roof

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Williams K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
  • Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with a 76% volumetric increase, and the harm to openness and inappropriateness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, failing to establish the very special circumstances required.

Framework references: 142, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy N33 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, Policy HDG3 of the Householder Design Guide 2012

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.