Lyncrest, Moorland Road, Bramhope, Leeds, LS16 9HW

Planning appeal 3328834 at Lyncrest, Moorland Road, Bramhope, Leeds, LS16 9HW (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 31 May 2024 by Inspector Williams K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

a two storey rear extension to match existing house with hipped roof

Authority: Leeds City Council
Appeal type: householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: residential · Householder developments
Inspector: Williams K
Postcode: LS16 9HW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the revised Framework and any relevant development plan policies
The effect on the openness and the purposes of the Green Belt
Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations. If so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt with a 76% volumetric increase, and the harm to openness and inappropriateness was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, failing to establish the very special circumstances required.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies: Saved Policy N33 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006Policy HDG3 of the Householder Design Guide 2012
National Planning Policy Framework: Paragraph 142Paragraph 153Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

39 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision

An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter — Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.

Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app — Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.

Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

Allowed13 October 20266011132
Rei House Stables, Ripley Lane, Guiseley, LS20 9NY
Dismissed12 October 20266011503
Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
Dismissed27 August 20266009680
The Bradford Golf Club, Hawksworth Lane, Guiseley, LS208NP
Allowed12 August 20266005793
Breary Grange Farm, Kings Road, Leeds, LS16 9JN
Dismissed24 July 20266006233
Uplands Cottage, Back Lane, Leeds, LS12 5HL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.