Planning appeal decision
12 Sunnybank, Micklefield, Leeds, LS25 4DQ
Dormer to front. Dormer to rear
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Burnham T
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area with regard to the front dormer window
What decided it
The front dormer window would have a significant adverse impact on the character and appearance of the area due to its bulky and domineering appearance, being out of character with the established terrace.
Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy (2019), saved policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review (2006), saved policy BD6 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review (2006), Policy HDG1 of the Leeds City Council Householder Design Guide SPD (April 2012)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®