Planning appeal decision
Pitchkettle Farm Goodboys Lane, Grazeley Green, Reading, RG7 1ND
Planning appeal 3329567 at Pitchkettle Farm Goodboys Lane, Grazeley Green, Reading, RG7 1ND (West Berkshire District Council) was dismissed on 30 October 2024 by Inspector Willis S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the development with regard to the local development strategy and access to a range of transport modes.
Erection of two modular buildings following demolition and removal of existing structures, and change of use of site to flexible Class B2/B8/E(g) use
- Authority
- West Berkshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- employment-industrial · Change of use
- Inspector
- Willis S
- Postcode
- RG7 1ND
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for the development with regard to the local development strategy and access to a range of transport modes
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the development maximises sustainable construction opportunities, with regard to the local development strategy
- The effect of the development on public safety, with particular regard to the off-site nuclear emergency planning arrangements for the Burghfield Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE)
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of the dwelling granted under 20/01304/CERTE with regard to noise and disturbance
- The effect of the development on highway safety
What decided it
The cumulative conflict of the scheme with development plan policies on locational strategy, character and appearance, and sustainable construction was not outweighed by the limited economic and other benefits.
The identified harms to locational strategy, character and appearance, and sustainable construction were not outweighed by the small economic benefits or the limited weight attributable to the fallback position, resulting in overall conflict with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ADPP1Policy ADPP6Policy CS8Policy CS9Policy CS10Policy CS13Policy CS14Policy CS15Policy CS19Policy K3Policy K5Policy K13Saved Policy OVS5Saved Policy OVS6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Berkshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed26 June 20266005876Royal Berkshire Shooting School, Tomb Farm, Ashampstead, RG8 8SD
- Dismissed19 June 202660052108 High Street, Pangbourne, Reading, RG8 7AB
- Allowed26 March 20263367152Land Adjacent To M4, Membury Airfield, Lambourn Woodlands, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7TJ
- Dismissed12 December 202533661659 Clay Close, Tilehurst, Reading , West Berkshire , RG31 5QB
- Dismissed21 August 20253359935Kennet Centre, Newbury, RG14 5EN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®